<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s that time again . . .</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peterfh.wordpress.com/2010/06/20/its-that-time-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peterfh.wordpress.com/2010/06/20/its-that-time-again/</link>
	<description>for FH Consultants and anyone else interested in Family History in the northern part of the N Amer Central Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:59:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdarby</title>
		<link>http://peterfh.wordpress.com/2010/06/20/its-that-time-again/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pdarby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterfh.wordpress.com/?p=198#comment-61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello Faye
Thank you for your comments
Have you sent feedback with your suggestions?
How long have the division numbers been there for Canada?  As I very rarely research in Canada this was  a surprise to me
Peter]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Faye<br />
Thank you for your comments<br />
Have you sent feedback with your suggestions?<br />
How long have the division numbers been there for Canada?  As I very rarely research in Canada this was  a surprise to me<br />
Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdarby</title>
		<link>http://peterfh.wordpress.com/2010/06/20/its-that-time-again/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pdarby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterfh.wordpress.com/?p=198#comment-60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thank you for your kind comments Julia - nice to get feedback ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you for your kind comments Julia &#8211; nice to get feedback </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdarby</title>
		<link>http://peterfh.wordpress.com/2010/06/20/its-that-time-again/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pdarby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterfh.wordpress.com/?p=198#comment-59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree Bill - and sent Feedback to SLC - as well as talking about it in my meeting today! Seems like the problem is largely limited to the 3 Prairie Provinces - although Summerside PEI looks interesting too Thank you for your vigilance - and for sending Feedback to familysearch support ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Bill &#8211; and sent Feedback to SLC &#8211; as well as talking about it in my meeting today! Seems like the problem is largely limited to the 3 Prairie Provinces &#8211; although Summerside PEI looks interesting too Thank you for your vigilance &#8211; and for sending Feedback to familysearch support </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faye French</title>
		<link>http://peterfh.wordpress.com/2010/06/20/its-that-time-again/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faye French]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 04:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterfh.wordpress.com/?p=198#comment-58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are doing a great job with your blog and I enjoy reading it. I&#039;m also concerned about the standardized places. Using division numbers for Canada makes no sense at all. What&#039;s the problem with having just 3 place parts?
Thanks for all you do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are doing a great job with your blog and I enjoy reading it. I&#8217;m also concerned about the standardized places. Using division numbers for Canada makes no sense at all. What&#8217;s the problem with having just 3 place parts?<br />
Thanks for all you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia Moore</title>
		<link>http://peterfh.wordpress.com/2010/06/20/its-that-time-again/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julia Moore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 23:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterfh.wordpress.com/?p=198#comment-57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for keeping us up to date with the NEW things! The newFamilySearch program is awesome and just keeps getting better.

I don&#039;t always get time to comment on this blog but I am watching it and enjoying the posts.
Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for keeping us up to date with the NEW things! The newFamilySearch program is awesome and just keeps getting better.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t always get time to comment on this blog but I am watching it and enjoying the posts.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Buchanan</title>
		<link>http://peterfh.wordpress.com/2010/06/20/its-that-time-again/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 20:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterfh.wordpress.com/?p=198#comment-56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a problem with the standardized place names, that I have reported to FamilySearch Support and FHCNET. Place names in western Canada have a non-existent &quot;Division&quot; number added where a county name would appear in some other localities, (like we see in the addresses of the FHCs).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a problem with the standardized place names, that I have reported to FamilySearch Support and FHCNET. Place names in western Canada have a non-existent &#8220;Division&#8221; number added where a county name would appear in some other localities, (like we see in the addresses of the FHCs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdarby</title>
		<link>http://peterfh.wordpress.com/2010/06/20/its-that-time-again/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pdarby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterfh.wordpress.com/?p=198#comment-55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hint: maybe Monday 21 June]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hint: maybe Monday 21 June</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
