<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why do we need to use a genealogy program on our computer instead of just using the new.familysearch.org website?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peterfh.wordpress.com/2011/06/05/why-do-we-need-to-use-a-genealogy-program-on-our-computer-instead-of-just-using-the-new-familysearch-org-website/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peterfh.wordpress.com/2011/06/05/why-do-we-need-to-use-a-genealogy-program-on-our-computer-instead-of-just-using-the-new-familysearch-org-website/</link>
	<description>for FH Consultants and anyone else interested in Family History in the northern part of the N Amer Central Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:59:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://peterfh.wordpress.com/2011/06/05/why-do-we-need-to-use-a-genealogy-program-on-our-computer-instead-of-just-using-the-new-familysearch-org-website/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 14:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterfh.wordpress.com/?p=461#comment-191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One reason that I tell the members is, NFS is a communal database and subject to all the problems that come with that. That in 99.9% of the cases suffices and the members will keep there own file. Another reason is that in my own case I have a large number of females with only a given name and no other information, they are attached to their spouse and children and could according to NFS be done, however, they are from England and already likely done properly, if I uploaded a file like that, chances are someone who trolls NFS looking for names would submit and low and behold a duplication has occurred. 

NFS is for clearing names for the Temple.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One reason that I tell the members is, NFS is a communal database and subject to all the problems that come with that. That in 99.9% of the cases suffices and the members will keep there own file. Another reason is that in my own case I have a large number of females with only a given name and no other information, they are attached to their spouse and children and could according to NFS be done, however, they are from England and already likely done properly, if I uploaded a file like that, chances are someone who trolls NFS looking for names would submit and low and behold a duplication has occurred. </p>
<p>NFS is for clearing names for the Temple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Hogg</title>
		<link>http://peterfh.wordpress.com/2011/06/05/why-do-we-need-to-use-a-genealogy-program-on-our-computer-instead-of-just-using-the-new-familysearch-org-website/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Hogg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 13:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterfh.wordpress.com/?p=461#comment-190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using a personal organizer with linkages to nFS and other features like note fields and media links is truly like organizing your information in a scrapbook to see if it all makes sense, is documented and is ready to be brought forward into a &#039;temple ready&#039; state worthy of the Church&#039;s data base. I think this is consistent with the concept / principle espoused in Moses 3:5.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using a personal organizer with linkages to nFS and other features like note fields and media links is truly like organizing your information in a scrapbook to see if it all makes sense, is documented and is ready to be brought forward into a &#8216;temple ready&#8217; state worthy of the Church&#8217;s data base. I think this is consistent with the concept / principle espoused in Moses 3:5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Strange</title>
		<link>http://peterfh.wordpress.com/2011/06/05/why-do-we-need-to-use-a-genealogy-program-on-our-computer-instead-of-just-using-the-new-familysearch-org-website/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Strange]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterfh.wordpress.com/?p=461#comment-189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You did a great job here!  Much less confusing than the KDs.

However, there are a couple of typo errors that completely change what I believe you were trying to say.  

In your first Note:  Did you mean to say &quot;disadvantages&quot; rather than advantages?

Under Why do some people object to doing this?  
1.  ... (did you mean to say &quot;without typing them&quot; rather than 
&quot;typing them.&quot;?

I would like to share this with others but need clarification on these first.   

Thanks for sharing and please kindly advise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You did a great job here!  Much less confusing than the KDs.</p>
<p>However, there are a couple of typo errors that completely change what I believe you were trying to say.  </p>
<p>In your first Note:  Did you mean to say &#8220;disadvantages&#8221; rather than advantages?</p>
<p>Under Why do some people object to doing this?<br />
1.  &#8230; (did you mean to say &#8220;without typing them&#8221; rather than<br />
&#8220;typing them.&#8221;?</p>
<p>I would like to share this with others but need clarification on these first.   </p>
<p>Thanks for sharing and please kindly advise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
