<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FamilySearch.org Update January 2012 and Rootstech 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peterfh.wordpress.com/2012/01/29/familysearch-org-update-january-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peterfh.wordpress.com/2012/01/29/familysearch-org-update-january-2012/</link>
	<description>for FH Consultants and anyone else interested in Family History in the northern part of the N Amer Central Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:59:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Buchanan</title>
		<link>http://peterfh.wordpress.com/2012/01/29/familysearch-org-update-january-2012/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peterfh.wordpress.com/?p=636#comment-282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Familysearch.org keeps getting better, but the recent changes introduced at least one glitch that was pointed out to me by a patron this week. If you search Ontario Marriages, 1869-1927 you will probably find that there are none. Try searching for everyone with a really common surname. The patron gave me the example of Smith. 

Ontario Marriages, 1869-1927
Search all collections

1-1 of 1 results for &gt;Name: Smith

We are unable to display search results due to technical difficulties. Please try searching again in a few minutes.

Maria Smith Elliott
Ontario Marriages, 1869-1927
 

I tried searching for some of the most common surnames and found no one.

This problem has now been reported.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Familysearch.org keeps getting better, but the recent changes introduced at least one glitch that was pointed out to me by a patron this week. If you search Ontario Marriages, 1869-1927 you will probably find that there are none. Try searching for everyone with a really common surname. The patron gave me the example of Smith. </p>
<p>Ontario Marriages, 1869-1927<br />
Search all collections</p>
<p>1-1 of 1 results for &gt;Name: Smith</p>
<p>We are unable to display search results due to technical difficulties. Please try searching again in a few minutes.</p>
<p>Maria Smith Elliott<br />
Ontario Marriages, 1869-1927</p>
<p>I tried searching for some of the most common surnames and found no one.</p>
<p>This problem has now been reported.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
